Code Review
Review your code changes against Sentry’s engineering practices. This skill checks for issues related to security, performance, testing, and design, helping you catch problems before merging. Use it to get feedback on pull requests and improve code quality.
Installation
This skill is self-contained. Copy the SKILL.md below directly into your project to get started.
.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md # Claude Code
.cursor/skills/code-review/SKILL.md # CursorOr install as a personal skill (available across all your projects):
~/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdYou can also install using the skills CLI:
npx skills add getsentry/skills --skill code-reviewRequires Node.js 18+.
SKILL.md
---
name: code-review
description: Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
---
# Sentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
## Review Checklist
### Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- **Runtime errors**: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- **Performance**: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- **Side effects**: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- **Backwards compatibility**: Breaking API changes without migration path
- **ORM queries**: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- **Security vulnerabilities**: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
### Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
### Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
### Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
## Feedback Guidelines
### Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
### Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
## Common Patterns to Flag
### Python/Django
```python
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
```
### TypeScript/React
```typescript
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
```
### Security
```python
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])
```
## References
- [Sentry Code Review Guidelines](https://develop.sentry.dev/engineering-practices/code-review/)
Originally by Sentry team, adapted here as an Agent Skills compatible SKILL.md.
This skill follows the Agent Skills open standard, supported by Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, and 20+ more editors.
Works with
Agent Skills format — supported by 20+ editors. Learn more